Security tightened as Paul O’Sullivan prepares to testify at Ad-hoc committee

Controversial forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan will appear before the parliamentary Ad-hoc committee, under full security arrangements. His testimony is expected to attract intense scrutiny, given his polarising public profile, his outspoken criticism of senior figures within the South African Police Service (SAPS), and ongoing questions about his own legal standing.

O’Sullivan was scheduled to testify last week but did not appear, citing concerns for his personal safety. The committee acknowledged the security risks and indicated that steps would be taken to ensure the protection of witnesses who believe they may be vulnerable to intimidation or threats.

The SAPS Ad Hoc Committee was established to investigate allegations of interference, corruption and misconduct within the police service. It has been hearing evidence from various witnesses as part of its mandate to identify systemic failures and make recommendations to Parliament.

No witnesses will be heard on Monday, with members of Parliament instead set to deal with housekeeping matters. These include finalising the witness programme, confirming the scheduling of testimony, and addressing procedural and security arrangements ahead of a series of high-profile appearances.

O’Sullivan is a former senior police officer who later became a private forensic investigator. He has been involved in several high-profile and controversial cases and has repeatedly accused senior SAPS officials and prosecutors of undermining investigations and protecting corrupt networks. 

However, O’Sullivan’s role has itself been the subject of controversy. He has been described by critics as being linked to President Cyril Ramaphosa’s inner circle, an allegation that has fuelled debate about his independence and motives. 

O’Sullivan is also known for his confrontational public style, frequently making strong allegations against named individuals in interviews. 

Parliamentary sources said arrangements had been made to ensure that O’Sullivan can testify safely and without disruption. Details of the security measures have not been disclosed, but they are understood to include heightened protection and controlled access to the committee venue.

The committee’s inquiry has generated significant public interest, as it examines claims that go to the heart of SAPS governance and credibility. O’Sullivan’s testimony is expected to address his dealings with SAPS leadership, alleged interference in investigations, and his experiences within the criminal justice system.

The committee is expected to continue hearing from additional witnesses in the coming weeks before compiling a report to Parliament.